RCP 2022-04
Enter NAR login credentials for access.
Please enter your username or email address. This should be the same login you use for your NAR membership
5 Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
- Home
- Join NAR
- Site Map
- Contact Us
- My Membership
- About NAR
- American Rocketry Challenge
- Model Rocket Info
- High Power Rocketry
- Educational Resources
- Find a Launch
- Local Clubs
- Insurance Questions/Claims
- Safety
- Rocket Motor Information
- Contest Flying – NAR Competition
- National Scoreboard
- US Team Selection Scoreboard
- Register an NAR Launch
- Competition Results Entry
- Team Registration
- Teams List
- Contest Events
- Competition Meets
- International Competition
- Competition Guide
- U.S. Model Rocket Sporting Code
- Rules Revision Process
- US National Model Rocket Performance Records
- Sport Rocketry Magazine
- Member Resources
- Website Fixes
- Donate
- What’s My NAR Number?
- Log out
High Power Rocket Certification
Design and Fly High Power Rocket Vehicles Learn MoreLocal Rocketry Clubs
Connect with Proven Rocketry Experts Find A Club TodayMembers-Only Forum
Engage in meaningful conversations about rocketry topics that matter. Get Connected!Sport Rocketry Magazine
Six 48 Page Issues a year with NAR Membership!
John makes a good justification for this RCP. I support this proposal.
As one who has only ever competed in one NARAM craftsmanship event, Classic Model at NARAM-60, and who did so with a model of relatively low difficulty both for the build and the paint scheme, I’ve wondered why “similarity of outline” and such got such a big chunk of the score, even though it helped me that time.
This is a long winded way to say that I agree with this proposal, even if it might make my life a little harder after NARAM this year.
This is a great idea and awards the right behavior for scale modelers.
Full support on this one. And John has judged for years, so this isn’t a random RCP. Someone with very good basis on a good change. I hope people will read the rules and approve this one. Thanks John, long overdue, IMO.
“experience shows that almost all entries generally adhere well to the outline of the modeled prototype.” The occasional exceptions embodied in “almost all” have been notable, such as when a commenter above who shall remain nameless entered an Aerobee 350’s first stage as a Nike Smoke : ) But close enough for judging work! We will still have enough SoO points for dealing with things like a Mercury-Redstone’s oversized kit fins, and I’ll just have to work past the muscle memory to score D Region Tomahawks with engine clips hanging out the back at 98 instead of 196.