Skip to Sidebar Skip to Content

National Association of Rocketry

  • Home
  • Join NAR
  • Site Map
  • Contact Us
  • My Membership
  • About NAR
    • Overview
    • Organization Awards
    • Organization Contacts
  • Donate

RCP 2022-03

Enter NAR login credentials for access.

Please enter your username or email address. This should be the same login you use for your NAR membership


Forgot your password? Need help?

8 Comments

  1. Robert Zurek says:
    24March23 at 8:16 pm

    Interesting idea Bob.
    The issue I see with it is that if someone flies a good qualified first flight and they destroys their rocket on a second attempt to improve their score with more missions points for example, there would be nothing left to judge even though they had a qualified flight.
    The other not so catastrophic case would be since damage points are cumulative, how would the model be judged for the first flight, if the second caused cosmetic damage.

    Log in to Reply
  2. DOUG HILLSON says:
    25March23 at 1:30 am

    An unlisted effect on competition in this RCP, is that contestants wouldn’t be given feedback from the judges on their entries if they had a DQ. This could negatively impact craftsmanship events by not facilitating advancing the level of competition as a whole.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Donald Carson says:
    28March23 at 1:42 pm

    I don’t understand the rationale for this proposed change. Do we have Judges complaining about the crush of Craftsmanship entries they have to judge?

    Has anyone tried this approach? Were the contestants happy to not get feedback on their model because they DQ’ed?

    If the Craftsmanship rules are silent on this issue, then the organizers are currently free to structure their contest either way. In fact, except for possibly NARAM, contest organizers can modify non-NRC event rules any way they want. Since Craftsmanship events are not a part of the NRC, this flexibility is already baked in to the current competition system.

    If a modeler goes to all the work to make and enter a Craftsmanship event, the least we can do is judge it for them.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Joseph Heckenbach says:
    30March23 at 8:22 pm

    I think the entry should be judged before flight in pristine undamaged condition as the modeler intended it to be judged. Putting so much emphasis on judging after flight turns a craftsmanship event into a durability contest.

    I personally don’t build or compete in scale of any kind, but I can appreciate the care and love that is put into these types of models. A modeler building an entry and competing at this level of craftsmanship deserves to have some kind of score to see how they stack up against their competitors.

    Log in to Reply
  5. DANIEL WOLF says:
    31March23 at 1:52 pm

    I fail to see the benefit of this change and it makes craftsmanship a logistical nightmare. The elephant in the room is what to do for craftsmanship judging (static points) for an entry that is lost, partially lost, or badly damaged. It will make “Scale” day at NARAM less interesting because contestants will be more conservative in their flights. Also, it would require the craftmanship event to be flown the 1st day of NARAM which makes for a more difficult week for the Contest Director, the Contest Board, and the Scale Judges. Now the craftsmanship event is flown on an abbreviated schedule so that there are a number of hours after the event for the points to be processed and sorted out and reviewed. Plus, ideally the CD puts a side deck together for the awards banquet. an abbreviated schedule on the last day is very helpful in getting all of that done. With craftsmanship as the only event the last day it works well. Having 2 performance events the last day means the range would need to be open longer. Limiting the last day to 1 event, means more events on other days. Would we need to fly another event on the 1st day of NARAM when craftsmanship would be flown?

    Finally, in a full 5 day NARAM, craftsmanship entries are turned in on Sunday night. That gives the judges from Sunday night through the day on Thursday to judge. Practically 4 days. If craftmanship in flown on Monday and scale turn-in is Monday night. The judges have just 3 days if we want to have viewing on Thursday night. In a shortened NARAM like this year, it would make it worse.

    Instead of this proposal, I would prefer an RCP that requires models to be judged before they are flown.

    Log in to Reply
  6. BRIAN GUZEK says:
    31March23 at 10:49 pm

    From both a logistics standpoint and a craft standpoint, I disagree, Bob, for the points mentioned above by others. I understand the thought, as a model rocket should, first and foremost, be designed to fly well. However, the rules already allow for the deduction of points due to damage. If you feel that these are under-represented, perhaps revise how they are doled out?

    Log in to Reply
  7. CHAD RING says:
    05April23 at 11:05 pm

    I am with Dan and Brian, why is this an issue? The only time craftsmanship is judged under a sanctioned event is NARAM. If we’re too lazy to judge everyone that takes the time and effort to enter a model, I propose we drop craftsmanship all together. And there is no way for a competitor to determine risk/reward on mission based on this. That’s the fun on the flight day (and entertainment). Judge ALL models, let people enjoy the viewing time (it’s fun and it also encourages those that have avoided craftsmanship before). For a local event, craftsmanship is not sanctioned, so you can do as you please, but again, at a national event, we should have the decency to judge every model that someone put effort in and entered. It’s not that many and since I’ve been friends with most of the judges for years, I’ve never heard much of a gripe of ‘too many models’. Tell me what other hobby would even consider this?? Too many problems from this approach, and negative on the craftsmanship part of our hobby.

    Log in to Reply
  8. MARC MCREYNOLDS says:
    21April23 at 10:27 pm

    There might be a problem with this RCP relative to Rule 11.8 Correctable Conditions. Under the current way of doing things (which, as Bob points out, is not a Pink Book requirement), model turn-in for static judging is near the start of NARAM. At that time we judges catch however many correctable conditions we can (e.g. missing NAR number), but there will often be 5-10 entries having omissions which aren’t found until later, after their data packets have been studied in detail.

    11.8 states “If the contest officials do not discover a [correctable] condition until during or after the flight is made … the flight will not be considered official.” So there would likely be some models reflown at the end of the week anyway, because “Disqualifications for static conditions of an entry are not permitted.” Even some entries which were flight-DQ’d from the event on Monday might get another chance, so long as the contestant can point to a deficiency in their data packet. Rule 11.8 is clear: Correctable Condition = flight doesn’t [didn’t] count. In either case, those reflown models would need some static points re-judging to account for any damage (it’s a different points schedule between static Craftsmanship points and Damage deductions applied after a flight)… but now it’s only hours until the awards banquet.

    Competitors could also take “unfair advantage” of this rule change, leaving out a required element from a data packet if the flying weather on Monday is horrible but the Friday forecast looks better. Because of Rule 11.8, they would be able to do that. So put in a simple/relatively safe single-stage low-powered flight on Monday which hopefully avoids damage, and save the go-for-broke reflight with staging etc for when better weather is expected.

    Historical aside as to why 11.8 exists, and why we probably don’t want to mess with it too much: At NARAM-13 most notably, a Vostok with all the associated trusswork towers which encircle the vehicle was entered in Super Scale. An incredible entry, but minus a parachute back when the rules said recovery systems had to be included. It was disqualified from the event under those rules. From instances such as that, it was decided over time that “static” omissions should simply be corrected by the entrant once they are identified, rather than result in disqualification. Hence Rule 11.8.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Previous story RCP 2022-02
  • Next story RCP 2022-04
    • Home
    • Join NAR
    • Site Map
    • Contact Us
    • My Membership
    • About NAR
    • American Rocketry Challenge
    • Model Rocket Info
      • The Sport Rocketry Hobby
      • Model Rocket Safety Code
      • Understanding FAA Regulations
    • High Power Rocketry
      • High Power Rocketry Certifications
      • High Power Rocket Safety Code
      • Understanding FAA Regulations
      • Filing for FAA Launch Authorization
      • High Power Resources
        • High Power Technical Reports
        • NAR HPR Certified Member Search
      • The NAR Rocket Science Achievement Award
    • Educational Resources
      • Online Mentoring Resources
      • NARTREK Skills Program
      • The NARTREK Cadet Program
      • 4-H
      • Air Force JROTC
      • Civil Air Patrol
      • Rocket Teacher Certification Program
      • Grants, Scholarships, and Recipients
      • Educator’s Newsletter Archive
    • Find a Launch
      • Listed Launches (Searchable)
      • Launch Calendar
      • Register an NAR Launch
    • Local Clubs
      • NAR Club Locator
      • Find an NAR Club Launch
      • Submit a Local Club / Submit Changes
      • Section FAQ’s
      • Section Guidebook
    • Insurance Questions/Claims
    • Safety
      • Safety Codes
      • Model Rocket Safety Code
      • High Power Rocket Safety Code
      • Radio Control Rocket Glider Safety Code
    • Rocket Motor Information
      • Certified Motors
        • Motor Related Lists
      • NAR Motor Testing
        • NAR Motor Testing Notices
      • Manufacturer Notifications
      • Report a Malfunctioning Motor
    • Contest Flying – NAR Competition
      • National Scoreboard
      • US Team Selection Scoreboard
      • Register an NAR Launch
      • Competition Results Entry
      • Team Registration
      • Teams List
      • Contest Events
      • Competition Meets
      • US National Model Rocket Performance Records – 8/2/19
      • International Competition
      • Competition Guide
      • U.S. Model Rocket Sporting Code
      • Rules Revision Process
    • Sport Rocketry Magazine
      • Magazine Submissions
      • Write It and Get Paid
      • Advertise in Sport Rocketry
      • Sample Issue
      • Contact Sport Rocketry
    • Member Resources
      • Members Only Forum
      • Magazine Archives
        • Sport Rocketry Magazine
        • eRocketeer Digital Editions
        • Member Guidebook Archive
        • American Spacemodeling Magazine
        • The Model Rocketeer Magazine
        • Model Rocketry Magazine
      • NARTREK Skills Program
      • R&D Reports
      • Technical Bibliography
      • NAR Insurance
        • Insurance Questions
        • Proof of Insurance
        • NAR Insurance Claim Form
      • NAR Association Documents
      • Promotional Materials
    • Website Fixes
    • Donate
    • What’s My NAR Number?
    • Log out

  • High Power Rocket Certification

    Design and Fly High Power Rocket Vehicles Learn More

  • Local Rocketry Clubs

    Connect with Proven Rocketry Experts Find A Club Today

  • Members-Only Forum

    Engage in meaningful conversations about rocketry topics that matter. Get Connected!

  • Sport Rocketry Magazine

    Six 48 Page Issues a year with NAR Membership!


  • Contact Nar

    National Association of Rocketry
    P.O. Box 407
    Marion, IA 52302

    Call: 319-373-8910

  • Join NAR

    The best way to get more out of the exciting hobby of rocketry is to connect with other flyers. The National Association of Rocketry can get you connected to the cutting edge of the hobby so you can learn how to fly higher, faster, and better. As an NAR member you will get:
    • Access to launch sites through local NAR clubs
    • An exclusive members only forum.
    • Sport Rocketry magazine
    • Insurance coverage for your flights
    • HPR Certification
  • Members Services

    The process of issuing a NAR member card for new, renewing, and HPR certification typically takes 4-6 weeks. The cards are sent weekly to a fulfillment company that prints them and does the mailing. In the event you need Proof of Membership or your HPR Certification, use the following links:

    • What’s My NAR Number?
    • Temporary NAR Member Confirmation
    • HPR Certified Member Search

© Copyright YEAR National Association of Rocketry | Privacy Notice

  • Home
  • Join NAR
  • Site Map
  • Contact Us
  • My Membership
  • About NAR
  • American Rocketry Challenge
  • Model Rocket Info
    ▼
    • The Sport Rocketry Hobby
    • Model Rocket Safety Code
    • Understanding FAA Regulations
  • High Power Rocketry
    ▼
    • High Power Rocketry Certifications
    • High Power Rocket Safety Code
    • Understanding FAA Regulations
    • Filing for FAA Launch Authorization
    • High Power Resources
      ▼
      • High Power Technical Reports
      • NAR HPR Certified Member Search
    • The NAR Rocket Science Achievement Award
  • Educational Resources
    ▼
    • Online Mentoring Resources
    • NARTREK Skills Program
    • The NARTREK Cadet Program
    • 4-H
    • Air Force JROTC
    • Civil Air Patrol
    • Rocket Teacher Certification Program
    • Grants, Scholarships, and Recipients
    • Educator’s Newsletter Archive
  • Find a Launch
    ▼
    • Listed Launches (Searchable)
    • Launch Calendar
    • Register an NAR Launch
  • Local Clubs
    ▼
    • NAR Club Locator
    • Find an NAR Club Launch
    • Submit a Local Club / Submit Changes
    • Section FAQ’s
    • Section Guidebook
  • Insurance Questions/Claims
  • Safety
    ▼
    • Safety Codes
    • Model Rocket Safety Code
    • High Power Rocket Safety Code
    • Radio Control Rocket Glider Safety Code
  • Rocket Motor Information
    ▼
    • Certified Motors
      ▼
      • Motor Related Lists
    • NAR Motor Testing
      ▼
      • NAR Motor Testing Notices
    • Manufacturer Notifications
    • Report a Malfunctioning Motor
  • Contest Flying – NAR Competition
    ▼
    • National Scoreboard
    • US Team Selection Scoreboard
    • Register an NAR Launch
    • Competition Results Entry
    • Team Registration
    • Teams List
    • Contest Events
    • Competition Meets
    • US National Model Rocket Performance Records – 8/2/19
    • International Competition
    • Competition Guide
    • U.S. Model Rocket Sporting Code
    • Rules Revision Process
  • Sport Rocketry Magazine
    ▼
    • Magazine Submissions
    • Write It and Get Paid
    • Advertise in Sport Rocketry
    • Sample Issue
    • Contact Sport Rocketry
  • Member Resources
    ▼
    • Members Only Forum
    • Magazine Archives
      ▼
      • Sport Rocketry Magazine
      • eRocketeer Digital Editions
      • Member Guidebook Archive
      • American Spacemodeling Magazine
      • The Model Rocketeer Magazine
      • Model Rocketry Magazine
    • NARTREK Skills Program
    • R&D Reports
    • Technical Bibliography
    • NAR Insurance
      ▼
      • Insurance Questions
      • Proof of Insurance
      • NAR Insurance Claim Form
    • NAR Association Documents
    • Promotional Materials
  • Website Fixes
  • Donate
  • What’s My NAR Number?
  • Log out