Skip to Sidebar Skip to Content

National Association of Rocketry

  • Home
  • Join NAR
  • Site Map
  • Contact Us
  • My Membership
  • About NAR
    • Overview
    • Organization Awards
    • Organization Contacts
  • Donate

RCP 2021-003

Enter NAR login credentials for access.

Please enter your username or email address. This should be the same login you use for your NAR membership


Forgot your password? Need help?

Your Message
You have already subscribed to this comment.
Congratulation, you have successfully subscribed.

Your report has been successfully sent. We will look into it.

11 Comments on RCP 2021-003

Reply
LYNN THOMAS said : subscriber Report 6 months ago

I doubt this would prove practical.

Reply
MARC MCREYNOLDS said : subscriber Report 7 months ago


This is a proposal which sounds good in theory: Make judging as unbiased as possible. In practice, from my experience as a scale judge or chief scale judge at about twenty-five NARAM's:

* I get emails months ahead from competitors asking my advice on prototype selection, data, and building techniques. When I finally see the resulting entry at NARAM, of course it's no mystery as to who built it. In many other cases, the model will be one we've judged at previous NARAM's. So the first problem with this RCP is that for the most part, it can't work as intended.  Half or more of the entries are going to be "known".

* During turn-in the judges are very busy directing traffic, dynamically shifting table space for one division or another to accomodate the mix of entries, answering rules-related questions that a random volunteer would be ill-equipped for, praising the efforts of junior entrants, and as time allows confirming that entries don't have any required elements missing. We can't do that if we aren't there -- presumably sequestered in our hotel rooms lest we see who's walking what through the hallways.

* Despite our turn-in diligence, for usually the day or two following I'm having to track down a sometimes long list of entrants whose entries will be disqualified if I can't interact with them to explain what's needed. Even if we wanted to simply DQ those (which we don't), Rule 11.8 allows the modeler to correct ommisions right up until flying time... yet in some cases we can't complete static judging without the missing data or model element(s).

Reply
Guy Gehlhausen said : subscriber Report 7 months ago

Although I agree in principle with the proposal, I doubt if it would have the intended affect.

Reply
Chandler STEVENS said : subscriber Report 7 months ago

This would need a bit more detailing and maybe a few practice runs before trying to enforce. For example, rules require NAR number (or name, though I can't remember the last time I saw this done) on the model, so that's not totally anonymous. Scale pack also has to have name, number, etc., At some point in the judging process, the scores have to go to the card so this means some degree of splitting the judging between [static] and [everything else].

Reply
Wolfram von Kiparski said : subscriber Report 7 months ago

What problem is this RCP trying to solve?  Don, you expressed an opinion and apparently expect us to just accept it as fact.  I agree with most of the others in that this RCP is impractical. 

I disagree with Barbara Tobin's opinion that, it is extremely difficult to not lean one direction or another based upon knowledge of the participant.  If it is that difficult to suspend subjective bias you should not be a judge.

 

 

Reply
CHAD RING said : editor Report 7 months ago

>>>If it is that difficult to suspend subjective bias you should not be a judge.<<< Those are good words to heed in the upcoming months. Thanks Wolf for this comment. ;)

Reply
Donald Carson said : microsite admin Report 7 months ago

Wolf, let me turn this around. Can you justify why judges need to know who made the model they are assessing? I have not seen any justification for why judges need to know who the modeler is (at least until the flight judging occurs). Blind judging can only help the impartiality of judging. Why fight this?

Reply
PATRICK PETERSON said : subscriber Report 7 months ago

Great idea in principle, but I suspect judges will end up knowing who made most of the models before final judging.  It would be difficult or impossible to enforce a blind, practically speaking. 

Reply
Barbara Tobin said : subscriber Report 7 months ago

As a public school teacher/band director, I must agree with updating this change in the judging model for scale. There will always be techniques used by present builders easily recognizable. However, to encourage new members to participate in this activity and increase the size of the community participating, ( a serious concern based upon past # participating), this will guarantee new members are judged equally on their techniques and presentations regardless of their years of participation. As a judge for 40 years in many types of activities, it is extremely difficult to not lean one direction or another based upon knowledge of the participant. This is regardless of a judges best intentions, it is human nature. This change is a very easy step to take to encourage all to participate knowing they will be judged exclusively on their build with no outside influence. Bind judging is not a new concept, it is a very important method used to make certain we are representing a fair and equal opportunity for all involved. 

Reply
CHAD RING said : editor Report 7 months ago

 

Sorry Don, but this one just doesn't make sense in the real world.  Judges know who has which model, simply by prototype/size/build techniques.  A 1/48th scratch Saturn IB is.....insert Flanigan here.  A larger, detailed BBX at about 1/11th scale is....yours truly.  If there was a super nice Saturn IB in B div....insert Alyssa.  A vector thrust controlled large scale prototype in C Div...likely same modeler that did it this year.  And so on with I-Beams, Royal, Pods, Feveryear, etc.  We are way too small of a community for most entries to be unknown.  :(

 

Reply
Donald Carson said : microsite admin Report 8 months ago

The specific "how to" implementation of this rule was purposely left out of this change, in order to allow the most practical methods to be developed. As an example, at NARAM, an official (not a scale judge) can check in scale models and data packets and assign a number assigned to the model/packet and maintain a list of the number and contestant. Judges would not be present at model check-in. General viewing can be held prior to model pick up as usual. Flight judging would occur and the judges would know the modelers identity at that point. Likewise, NRC data input folders for craftsmanship events (if they continued as NRC events) need not be linked in an identifiable way by the static judges. flight judging would be at the local field level and not be blind judging. Clubs that want to hold Craftsmanship Events at local contests as non-NRC events are free to modify the rules (like waiving the blind judging requirement) just as they are currently free to do for any non-NRC event. 

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Previous story RCP 2021-004
  • Next story RCP 2021-001
    • The American Rocketry Challenge
    • Model Rocket Info
      • The Sport Rocketry Hobby
      • Model Rocket Safety Code
      • Understanding FAA Regulations
    • High Power Rocketry
      • High Power Rocketry Certifications
      • High Power Rocket Safety Code
      • Understanding FAA Regulations
      • Filing for FAA Launch Authorization
      • High Power Resources
        • High Power Technical Reports
        • NAR HPR Certified Member Search
      • The NAR Rocket Science Achievement Award
    • Educational Resources
      • Online Mentoring Resources
      • NARTREK Skills Program
      • The NARTREK Cadet Program
      • 4-H
      • Air Force JROTC
      • Civil Air Patrol
      • Rocket Teacher Certification Program
      • Grants, Scholarships, and Recipients
      • Educator’s Newsletter Archive
    • Find a Launch
      • General Launch Information
      • Launch Calendar
      • Find a Contest
      • Register an NAR Launch
    • Local Clubs
      • NAR Club Locator
      • Find an NAR Club Launch
      • Submit a Local Club / Submit Changes
      • Section FAQ’s
      • Section Guidebook
    • Insurance Questions/Claims
    • Safety
      • Safety Codes
      • Model Rocket Safety Code
      • High Power Rocket Safety Code
      • Radio Control Rocket Glider Safety Code
    • Rocket Motor Information
      • Certified Motors
        • Motor Related Lists
      • NAR Motor Testing
        • NAR Motor Testing Notices
      • Manufacturer Notifications
      • Report a Malfunctioning Motor
    • Contest Flying – NAR Competition
      • National Scoreboard
      • US Team Selection Scoreboard
      • Find a Contest
      • Register an NAR Launch
      • Competition Results Entry
      • Team Registration
      • Teams List
      • Contest Events
      • Competition Meets
      • US National Model Rocket Performance Records – 8/2/19
      • International Competition
      • Competition Guide
      • U.S. Model Rocket Sporting Code
      • Rules Revision Process
    • Sport Rocketry Magazine
      • Magazine Submissions
      • Write It and Get Paid
      • Advertise in Sport Rocketry
      • Sample Issue
      • Contact Sport Rocketry
    • Member Resources
      • Publication Archives
        • Sport Rocketry Magazine
        • American Spacemodeling Magazine
        • The Model Rocketeer Magazine
        • Model Rocketry Magazine
        • eRocketeer Digital Editions
        • Member Guidebook Archive
      • NARTREK Skills Program
      • R&D Reports
      • Technical Bibliography
      • NAR Insurance
        • Insurance Questions
        • Proof of Insurance
        • NAR Insurance Claim Form
      • NAR Association Documents
      • Promotional Materials
    • NAR Products
    • Website Fixes
    • Recent Website Changes
    • Donate

  • Sport Rocketry Magazine

    Six 48 Page Issues a year Free with NAR Membership Today

  • Local Rocketry Clubs

    Connect with Proven Rocketry Experts FIND A CLUB TODAY

  • High Power Rocket Certification

    Design and Fly High Power Rocket Vehicles Learn More

  • Contact Nar

    National Association of Rocketry
    P.O. Box 407
    Marion, IA 52302

    Call: 319-373-8910

  • Join NAR

    The best way to get more out of the exciting hobby of rocketry is to connect with other flyers. The National Association of Rocketry can get you connected to the cutting edge of the hobby so you can learn how to fly higher, faster, and better. As an NAR member you will get:

    • Access to launch sites through local NAR clubs
    • The bimonthly color magazine "Sport Rocketry"
    • Insurance coverage for your flights
    • Certification for high power rocket flying

    Join Nar

  • Latest NAR Rocket News

    • RCP Cycle 2019-2020 23August21
    • Join a Section 03August21
    • Fly With Friends!!! 09August20
    • RCP Ballot 2019-2020 12May20
    • RCP’s of the Past 27August18
    • Sport Rocketry Magazine 27September17

© Copyright YEAR National Association of Rocketry | Privacy Notice

  • The American Rocketry Challenge
  • Model Rocket Info
    ▼
    • The Sport Rocketry Hobby
    • Model Rocket Safety Code
    • Understanding FAA Regulations
  • High Power Rocketry
    ▼
    • High Power Rocketry Certifications
    • High Power Rocket Safety Code
    • Understanding FAA Regulations
    • Filing for FAA Launch Authorization
    • High Power Resources
      ▼
      • High Power Technical Reports
      • NAR HPR Certified Member Search
    • The NAR Rocket Science Achievement Award
  • Educational Resources
    ▼
    • Online Mentoring Resources
    • NARTREK Skills Program
    • The NARTREK Cadet Program
    • 4-H
    • Air Force JROTC
    • Civil Air Patrol
    • Rocket Teacher Certification Program
    • Grants, Scholarships, and Recipients
    • Educator’s Newsletter Archive
  • Find a Launch
    ▼
    • General Launch Information
    • Launch Calendar
    • Find a Contest
    • Register an NAR Launch
  • Local Clubs
    ▼
    • NAR Club Locator
    • Find an NAR Club Launch
    • Submit a Local Club / Submit Changes
    • Section FAQ’s
    • Section Guidebook
  • Insurance Questions/Claims
  • Safety
    ▼
    • Safety Codes
    • Model Rocket Safety Code
    • High Power Rocket Safety Code
    • Radio Control Rocket Glider Safety Code
  • Rocket Motor Information
    ▼
    • Certified Motors
      ▼
      • Motor Related Lists
    • NAR Motor Testing
      ▼
      • NAR Motor Testing Notices
    • Manufacturer Notifications
    • Report a Malfunctioning Motor
  • Contest Flying – NAR Competition
    ▼
    • National Scoreboard
    • US Team Selection Scoreboard
    • Find a Contest
    • Register an NAR Launch
    • Competition Results Entry
    • Team Registration
    • Teams List
    • Contest Events
    • Competition Meets
    • US National Model Rocket Performance Records – 8/2/19
    • International Competition
    • Competition Guide
    • U.S. Model Rocket Sporting Code
    • Rules Revision Process
  • Sport Rocketry Magazine
    ▼
    • Magazine Submissions
    • Write It and Get Paid
    • Advertise in Sport Rocketry
    • Sample Issue
    • Contact Sport Rocketry
  • Member Resources
    ▼
    • Publication Archives
      ▼
      • Sport Rocketry Magazine
      • American Spacemodeling Magazine
      • The Model Rocketeer Magazine
      • Model Rocketry Magazine
      • eRocketeer Digital Editions
      • Member Guidebook Archive
    • NARTREK Skills Program
    • R&D Reports
    • Technical Bibliography
    • NAR Insurance
      ▼
      • Insurance Questions
      • Proof of Insurance
      • NAR Insurance Claim Form
    • NAR Association Documents
    • Promotional Materials
  • NAR Products
  • Website Fixes
  • Recent Website Changes
  • Donate