Skip to Sidebar Skip to Content

National Association of Rocketry

  • Home
  • Join NAR
  • Site Map
  • Contact Us
  • My Membership
  • About NAR
    • Overview
    • Organization Awards
    • Organization Contacts
  • Donate

RCP 2021-005

Enter NAR login credentials for access.

Please enter your username or email address. This should be the same login you use for your NAR membership


Forgot your password? Need help?

Your Message
You have already subscribed to this comment.
Congratulation, you have successfully subscribed.

Your report has been successfully sent. We will look into it.

15 Comments on RCP 2021-005

Reply
MARK B. BUNDICK said : subscriber Report 6 months ago

Given the technical improvements in altimeter size and weight along with new motor introductions, I suggest retiring all the records to the Hall of Fame, and opening things up to set new records!

Reply
LYNN THOMAS said : subscriber Report 6 months ago

 

This works for me.  I still like the idea of occasionally doing it optically, and showing/teaching it to interested newcomers, but for records, yes, altimeters.

 

Reply
Tom Disch said : subscriber Report 6 months ago

I support this rule change to use altimeters only for altitude tracking. I do not support using the highest altitude for National records whether optically tracked or using an altimeter. I have never personally used optical tracking to determine maximum altitude but I have talked to people who have and the process seems much more prone to error due to baseline layout, cloudy skies, and human error. I would support maintaining recognition of any optically tracked records that are higher than altimeter based as they are now. I do not think it makes sense to recognize as a National record an altitude established using a more error prone technique.

Reply
DANIEL KRAUSE said : subscriber Report 7 months ago

I agree with eliminating Theodolite tracking and freezing the records with this method on the date of the change, and moving forward only using altimeters for altitude tracking.

Reply
STEVE KRISTAL said : subscriber Report 7 months ago

I like this proposal.  

Reply
CHAD RING said : editor Report 7 months ago

 

Hi Bob,

When this was put in place over 10 years ago, lightest altimeter was around 12g. And 18mm.  So legit for separate records.  Now altimeters are superior to optical tracking.  10 years ago, I'm with you.  Now, I disagree.  Let the performance stand.  Not letting the optical performance stand is like saying stopwatches that were not accurate to .001 are no longer legit.  And this has nothing to do with if I may or may not have that record.  Let the optical records be beaten as have been for years.  Performance over tech always.  That's what we are about.  :)

 

Reply
Chris Kidwell said : Report 7 months ago

I agree with Chad on taking the higher of altimeter or optical records. I had intended to modify the RCP before it was published for comment but never got around to it. I suggest the wording for Effect on Competition be modified to the following: Records in altitude events will no longer be separated based on optical vs altimeter. For existing records, the current record shall be the higher of either the existing optical or altimeter record, and the lower score shall be retired. In the case of a tie, use the record with the later date for the current record. The retired records will no longer be displayed in the active record list, but will remain in the Hall of Fame and in the raw data which is available on the NAR web site. No data will be lost. Retired records will be marked as Retired to indicate they were not surpassed but are no longer being tracked.

Reply
Robert Zurek said : subscriber Report 7 months ago

 

I think the removal of theodolite tracking is warranted. I do not however like the removal of all of the optical tracked records. I think they should be retained and frozen at the date a new rule is enacted. I do not agree with Chad's idea to keep the higher record of the two as it is not apples to apples, which I am assuming was the reason to have separate records in the first place.  A quick look at the records shows optical almost always exceeding altimeter until you get to d motors where you have the issue of seeing it and the loss of resolution for optical tracking.

 

Reply
John Lyngdal said : editor Report 7 months ago

TARC has been using altimeters for altitude measurement for nearly 20 years and has shown that their use is a functional replacement to theodolites and simplifies range operations. Not to mention that implementation will eliminated track lost or non-converging flights that work to the detriment of the flier.

Reply
EDWARD LACROIX said : Report 7 months ago

I agree with Dr. Kidwell's proposed change. 

Reply
CHAD RING said : editor Report 7 months ago

 

Agree this is the way to go from here on forward. I do have two points to consider. 

First, remove the 'must be returned' part from 20.4.  There is no reason a Flight Sketch altimeter needs to be physically 'returned' to a table.  If it's lost/in tree/etc, correct altimeter can be verified by its unique serial number via bluetooth link.  And there are sure to be several other altimeters that can be read without bringing it 'back' available in near future.

Second, I would like to see that the higher performance record be the one that stands, in cases where there are both 'optical' and 'altimeter' records, with the lesser being retired.  For example, if C Div. B ALT records are 500 meters optical and 450 meters altimeter, then the 500 meter record stands with 'optical' listed in the altimeter type column on records list.  The 450 meter altimeter record would be the one retired in this case.  If those numbers were reversed, then it would be the altimeter record that stands and the optical that would be retired.  In this way, we are preserving that actual highest performance, not by how it was recorded.  Also, with probably the exception of 1/8A events, altimeters are now higher performance than tracking powder; no way you're getting a powder cloud for less than one gram of dust. :)

 

 

Reply
Chris Kidwell said : Report 7 months ago

I agree that FS altimeters have unique properties that allow it to be read without a physical return. But the scope of this RCP is just to eliminate optical tracking and realign the wording to be specific to altimeters. Adding a special case for FS should be done in a separate RCP.

Reply
WILLIAM COOKE said : subscriber Report 8 months ago

A couple of typos - "Scope" in 20.1 should be bolded - but this change is way overdue. I think there are only a handful NAR members left who can do proper optical tracking. 

Reply
Donald Carson said : microsite admin Report 8 months ago

This is a sensible change. I do not see anyone wanting to track optically ever again.

Reply
Garth Illerbrun said : subscriber Report 8 months ago

With the plethora of approved Altimeters, this change makes sense. Theodolite tracking will now be relegated to the education field. The only concern in the short term, produced by supply chain interruptions is the electronic component market. Several popular altimeters are currently unavailable due to this shortage of components.

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Previous story RCP# 2019-10
  • Next story RCP 2021-008
    • The American Rocketry Challenge
    • Model Rocket Info
      • The Sport Rocketry Hobby
      • Model Rocket Safety Code
      • Understanding FAA Regulations
    • High Power Rocketry
      • High Power Rocketry Certifications
      • High Power Rocket Safety Code
      • Understanding FAA Regulations
      • Filing for FAA Launch Authorization
      • High Power Resources
        • High Power Technical Reports
        • NAR HPR Certified Member Search
      • The NAR Rocket Science Achievement Award
    • Educational Resources
      • Online Mentoring Resources
      • NARTREK Skills Program
      • The NARTREK Cadet Program
      • 4-H
      • Air Force JROTC
      • Civil Air Patrol
      • Rocket Teacher Certification Program
      • Grants, Scholarships, and Recipients
      • Educator’s Newsletter Archive
    • Find a Launch
      • General Launch Information
      • Launch Calendar
      • Find a Contest
      • Register an NAR Launch
    • Local Clubs
      • NAR Club Locator
      • Find an NAR Club Launch
      • Submit a Local Club / Submit Changes
      • Section FAQ’s
      • Section Guidebook
    • Insurance Questions/Claims
    • Safety
      • Safety Codes
      • Model Rocket Safety Code
      • High Power Rocket Safety Code
      • Radio Control Rocket Glider Safety Code
    • Rocket Motor Information
      • Certified Motors
        • Motor Related Lists
      • NAR Motor Testing
        • NAR Motor Testing Notices
      • Manufacturer Notifications
      • Report a Malfunctioning Motor
    • Contest Flying – NAR Competition
      • National Scoreboard
      • US Team Selection Scoreboard
      • Find a Contest
      • Register an NAR Launch
      • Competition Results Entry
      • Team Registration
      • Teams List
      • Contest Events
      • Competition Meets
      • US National Model Rocket Performance Records – 8/2/19
      • International Competition
      • Competition Guide
      • U.S. Model Rocket Sporting Code
      • Rules Revision Process
    • Sport Rocketry Magazine
      • Magazine Submissions
      • Write It and Get Paid
      • Advertise in Sport Rocketry
      • Sample Issue
      • Contact Sport Rocketry
    • Member Resources
      • Publication Archives
        • Sport Rocketry Magazine
        • American Spacemodeling Magazine
        • The Model Rocketeer Magazine
        • Model Rocketry Magazine
        • eRocketeer Digital Editions
        • Member Guidebook Archive
      • NARTREK Skills Program
      • R&D Reports
      • Technical Bibliography
      • NAR Insurance
        • Insurance Questions
        • Proof of Insurance
        • NAR Insurance Claim Form
      • NAR Association Documents
      • Promotional Materials
    • NAR Products
    • Website Fixes
    • Recent Website Changes
    • Donate

  • Sport Rocketry Magazine

    Six 48 Page Issues a year Free with NAR Membership Today

  • Local Rocketry Clubs

    Connect with Proven Rocketry Experts FIND A CLUB TODAY

  • High Power Rocket Certification

    Design and Fly High Power Rocket Vehicles Learn More

  • Contact Nar

    National Association of Rocketry
    P.O. Box 407
    Marion, IA 52302

    Call: 319-373-8910

  • Join NAR

    The best way to get more out of the exciting hobby of rocketry is to connect with other flyers. The National Association of Rocketry can get you connected to the cutting edge of the hobby so you can learn how to fly higher, faster, and better. As an NAR member you will get:

    • Access to launch sites through local NAR clubs
    • The bimonthly color magazine "Sport Rocketry"
    • Insurance coverage for your flights
    • Certification for high power rocket flying

    Join Nar

  • Latest NAR Rocket News

    • RCP Cycle 2019-2020 23August21
    • Join a Section 03August21
    • Fly With Friends!!! 09August20
    • RCP Ballot 2019-2020 12May20
    • RCP’s of the Past 27August18
    • Sport Rocketry Magazine 27September17

© Copyright YEAR National Association of Rocketry | Privacy Notice

  • The American Rocketry Challenge
  • Model Rocket Info
    ▼
    • The Sport Rocketry Hobby
    • Model Rocket Safety Code
    • Understanding FAA Regulations
  • High Power Rocketry
    ▼
    • High Power Rocketry Certifications
    • High Power Rocket Safety Code
    • Understanding FAA Regulations
    • Filing for FAA Launch Authorization
    • High Power Resources
      ▼
      • High Power Technical Reports
      • NAR HPR Certified Member Search
    • The NAR Rocket Science Achievement Award
  • Educational Resources
    ▼
    • Online Mentoring Resources
    • NARTREK Skills Program
    • The NARTREK Cadet Program
    • 4-H
    • Air Force JROTC
    • Civil Air Patrol
    • Rocket Teacher Certification Program
    • Grants, Scholarships, and Recipients
    • Educator’s Newsletter Archive
  • Find a Launch
    ▼
    • General Launch Information
    • Launch Calendar
    • Find a Contest
    • Register an NAR Launch
  • Local Clubs
    ▼
    • NAR Club Locator
    • Find an NAR Club Launch
    • Submit a Local Club / Submit Changes
    • Section FAQ’s
    • Section Guidebook
  • Insurance Questions/Claims
  • Safety
    ▼
    • Safety Codes
    • Model Rocket Safety Code
    • High Power Rocket Safety Code
    • Radio Control Rocket Glider Safety Code
  • Rocket Motor Information
    ▼
    • Certified Motors
      ▼
      • Motor Related Lists
    • NAR Motor Testing
      ▼
      • NAR Motor Testing Notices
    • Manufacturer Notifications
    • Report a Malfunctioning Motor
  • Contest Flying – NAR Competition
    ▼
    • National Scoreboard
    • US Team Selection Scoreboard
    • Find a Contest
    • Register an NAR Launch
    • Competition Results Entry
    • Team Registration
    • Teams List
    • Contest Events
    • Competition Meets
    • US National Model Rocket Performance Records – 8/2/19
    • International Competition
    • Competition Guide
    • U.S. Model Rocket Sporting Code
    • Rules Revision Process
  • Sport Rocketry Magazine
    ▼
    • Magazine Submissions
    • Write It and Get Paid
    • Advertise in Sport Rocketry
    • Sample Issue
    • Contact Sport Rocketry
  • Member Resources
    ▼
    • Publication Archives
      ▼
      • Sport Rocketry Magazine
      • American Spacemodeling Magazine
      • The Model Rocketeer Magazine
      • Model Rocketry Magazine
      • eRocketeer Digital Editions
      • Member Guidebook Archive
    • NARTREK Skills Program
    • R&D Reports
    • Technical Bibliography
    • NAR Insurance
      ▼
      • Insurance Questions
      • Proof of Insurance
      • NAR Insurance Claim Form
    • NAR Association Documents
    • Promotional Materials
  • NAR Products
  • Website Fixes
  • Recent Website Changes
  • Donate